![]() |
| Andrew Smith Sr. Assistant Director VFBF Governmental Relations |
On-Farm Activities Compromise Legislation Passes Senate
![]() |
| Trey Davis Assistant Director VFBF Governmental Relations |
-sell agricultural products and related items incidental to your operation including food products that comply with state law
-hold activities on your farm including pick-your-own operations, agritourism, hayrides, etc.
Localities will still have the ability to craft ordinances relating to agritourism but cannot prohibit these activities unless there is a direct impact on the health, safety, or general welfare of the public.
In the 2013 General Assembly, legislation was defeated that would have expanded the Right-to-Farm Act to include a broad range of on-farm activities. Farm Bureau expressed concerns of adding the proposed language (HB1430) to this specific Code section as it is intended to protect production agriculture from being deemed a nuisance by localities. As a result of these discussions, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) convened the On-Farm Activities Working Group (OFAWG) in 2013 comprised of private citizens, local government representatives and agricultural stakeholder groups, including Virginia Farm Bureau.
Following the final meeting of the OFAWG, a consensus was reached among the majority of the participants to present a compromise bill in the 2014 General Assembly. This compromise legislation adds a new part to the appropriate local government Code section (§15.2) allowing agritourism activities at an agricultural operation to be permitted unless there is a substantial impact on the health, safety or welfare of the public. The legislation further allows the sale of agricultural or silvicultural products and the preparation and sale of food products, as long as those food products currently comply with state law.
One of the recurring issues in Richmond over the past two years has been the right of localities to restrict (or not) farm-related businesses. This issue has consumed the Ag Committee and caused some pretty sharp divides.
Here is the context:
In Virginia, we have millions of acres dedicated to agriculture. A small percentage of this acreage is located on family-owned farms. More and more, these farms have become boutique operations, which sell their wares in order to be profitable. The best example is farm-based wineries which have become a cottage industry (literally) in Loudoun and Fauquier Counties.Of course, there is an another trend which conflicts with the growth in farm businesses. That is the migration of wealthy people to these picturesque valleys. To many, these wineries and other farm businesses are a nuisance. With that in mind, some counties have created zoning ordinances to restrict farm-based businesses.
I’m a co-sponsor of SB 51 which simply states that localities must make a finding of “substantial impact” on health and welfare before it moves to restrict a business which is based on agricultural products.
(Note: Woodstock music festival would not qualify as a farm product industry. Well, actually it might. Okay, never mind).
I think this is only fair. An owner of agriculturally zoned land has rights. Already, she must jump through a number of regulatory hoops in order to sell her own products. (If selling food, it’s the VDH; if selling alcohol, it’s the ABC). For example, the ABC license already requires a public hearing and that license can limit hours and mode of operation.
Allowing localities to put a Special Use Permit process automatically on top of the existing regulatory structure will kill farm businesses, which is an outcome that some might support. But I don’t and so I’m supporting SB 51.It passed the Ag Committee on a 10-5 vote last week and will be on the floor today.
(Update at 1:45 pm)
Bill has passed the Senate on a 32-7 vote.
– See more at: http://oxroadsouth.com/2014/02/farming-and-sb-51/#sthash.FGxutHFv.dpuf
Breaking News: Senate Passes Farm Bill, Heads to the White House
![]() |
| VFBF President Wayne F. Pryor |
Governor McAuliffe Announces First Agriculture and Forestry Industries Development Fund Planning Grants of Administration
Breaking News: House Passes Farm Bill
“We now turn our attention to the Senate for timely passage of the bill, which will provide farmers and ranchers certainty for the coming year and allow the Agriculture Department to begin planning for implementation of the bill’s provisions.
“Farm Bureau is optimistic the final 2014 farm bill will soon be ready for the president’s signature, and America’s farmers and ranchers can, with certainty, continue with their business of providing food and jobs for America.”
Farm Bill Filed; Farm Bureau Urges Passage
![]() |
| AFBF President Bob Stallman |
Legislative Day moves to Feb. 11-12
Governor McAuliffe Announces More Than $1 Million in Farmland Preservation Grants
Bedford Young Farmers Place Second At American Farm Bureau Convention
From the Field: Advocacy–My Personal Story
From the Field is a bi-monthly column writtenby Mark Campbell, Farm Bureau Field Services Director for the Central District. He writes about Farm Bureau member benefits and County Farm Bureau activities.
http://WVIR.images.worldnow.com/interface/js/WNVideo.js?rnd=440810;hostDomain=www.nbc29.com;playerWidth=480;playerHeight=300;isShowIcon=true;clipId=9730296;flvUri=;partnerclipid=;adTag=News;advertisingZone=;enableAds=true;landingPage=;islandingPageoverride=false;playerType=STANDARD_EMBEDDEDscript;controlsType=fixedNBC29 WVIR Charlottesville, VA News, Sports and Weather
I think the most dominant message in the agriculture community last year was about agriculture advocacy; getting the message about today’s agriculture industry out to the general public. It didn’t matter what commodity you raised; every trade magazine talked about it. Numerous daily ag emails that I subscribe to talked about it. But when faced with having to deliver the message yourself, the mantra of telling agriculture’s story hits home.
This happened to me on Monday afternoon. Emily Nelson, one of the staff from my soil and water conservation district, called and asked if I would be willing to be interviewed from a farmer’s perspective by the NBC TV station in Charlottesville about cost share conservation programs. I have to admit that I was initially reluctant and tried to think of some other people. But I then realized that I needed to seize on the opportunity when presented. There wasn’t much time since the reporter wanted to come to the farm in less than 24 hours. So I agreed and mentally prepared myself for some comments that I wanted to make.
I checked with Martha Moore, and she gave me a couple of comments, specifically about supporting the budget amendments for funding of cost-share agriculture BMPs by Senator Hanger and Delegate Scott. When it was all said and done, I think that having less than 24 hours’ notice was probably best, because the waiting time made me more anxious about what I was going to say.
Tuesday at 12:30 pm, the TV reporter and two staff from the soil and water district arrived. I took them to two riparian areas, and he interviewed me and Emily of the soil and water district. Both of us had great presentations and great comments. We didn’t high-five afterward, but it was one of those occasions when you feel that you just nailed it. I took the opportunity to give the reporter a paper with all of my contact information and offered myself as a resource for agriculture information and anything about beef and beef cattle, which he seemed very appreciative. They left at 1:30 pm.
The story aired at 5:30 pm, but I didn’t get to see it since I was in a budget meeting in Charlottesville. However, I did see it online and the video is above for you to view. The story that ran didn’t include any of my videoed interview or Emily’s interview. However, he did use some of our comments. One hour combination of talking and video was edited to 1 minute and 11 seconds. The text of the online story was O.K., but I didn’t like that one of his comments about cattle being a large pollutant to streams followed my comment, giving the appearance that I said it. In conclusion, the interview and story was positive, because it did get some of the agriculture message out to the general public, even though it wasn’t all the comments that I had hoped for. Most importantly, I was able to share that farmers care about water quality and are doing their part. I am very pleased that the reporter had interest in doing a story about cost share conservation programs and was willing to make the 45 minute drive from Charlottesville to Nelson County. I also had the opportunity to make myself available to him as a resource for agriculture issues.
This was my experience, but other farmers have been active recently. Lynnwood Broaddus of Caroline County wrote a letter to the editor in the Free Lance Star newspaper in Fredericksburg as a rebuttal to comments made about AFBF’s lawsuit appeal challenging EPA’s regulation of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Vickie Gibson of Orange County responded to false and derogatory advertising by an Arby’s franchise owner in Richmond comparing grass fed beef to grain fed beef. Pictured in the ad was a nice piece of sod compared to a bucket filled with corn, candy, and syringes. Vickie quickly contacted the franchise owner to correct their information. She also sent the message out through Facebook. I read the letter, and she did a great job. I think some of our workshops with U.S. Farmers and Ranchers Alliance have paid dividends.
Advocacy can take many forms such as the three that I mentioned: TV, newspaper, and social media. In our age of abundant and immediate information, the general public is still misinformed and ignorant about agriculture. However, the food movement over the past decade has created an open discussion and is creating more awareness. That being said, we still need to tell our story and be ready to take advantage of opportunities whenever and wherever they are.
Another opportunity to advocate for agriculture will occur next week in Richmond. Farmers from all over the state will be visiting with legislators in the General Assembly to voice their opinions on issues and tell their story. Until next time, Mark








