Every four years, the American Farm Bureau Federation asks the Democratic and Republican presidential nominees to address the issues that concern farmers and ranchers the most. We asked Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump the same questions.

This is the last article in the #Vote4Ag series from AFBF. Don’t forget to vote on Tuesday!

If you’ve been involved with Farm Bureau in the past several years you know about our involvement and leadership in opposition to the “Water of the U.S.” or WOTUS rule from EPA.  Let’s be clear up-front: clean water is important to farmers and ranchers.   Water is necessary for the farm and ranch to thrive!  And farmers and ranchers are committed to protecting our nation’s water resources.

Our issue is with the regulations and enforcement of the EPA under the WOTUS rule.  So, what are talking about?  The EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) finalized a rule significantly expanding the definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act (CWA).  This regulation expands federal authority beyond the limits approved by Congress and affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court.  Our fear is that the EPA will use this new jurisdiction over things any ordinary person would call land – landscape features that you will find on just about any farm or ranch in the country.

Continue reading →

Every four years, the American Farm Bureau Federation asks the Democratic and Republican presidential nominees to address the issues that concern farmers and ranchers the most. We asked Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump the same questions.

From farmers to the animals and plants in their care, a healthy environment and clean air are vital for their well-being.  Stringent Clean Air Act standards, and in particular new regulations concerning greenhouse gases (GHG), offer a moment for reflection.  Which is why GHG and clean air is a key issue in the upcoming election.

Continue reading →

Earlier this year, Virginia Farm Bureau Federation sent a questionnaire to candidates for Virginia seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Candidates were asked to answer five questions dealing with issues important to Virginia’s agricultural community.

Click on the candidates’ names to see their responses; the absence of a hyperlink indicates a candidate did not respond.

Go here to see their responses: https://vafarmbureau.org/Policy-Action/Congressional

The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries is asking for comments on changes to hunting, trapping, or other wildlife regulations that you would like to see for the 2017–2018 seasons. They are interested in understanding the values and concerns behind your recommended changes to our hunting, trapping, and wildlife laws. This information will help the Department determine the best course of action to address potential regulation changes. Comments will be accepted until November 30, 2016.

Click here to make comments: https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/regulations/2017-2018-terrestrial-wildlife-scoping-period/

Every four years, the American Farm Bureau Federation asks the Democratic and Republican presidential nominees to address the issues that concern farmers and ranchers the most. We asked Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump the same questions.

Do you know the background of the Endangered Species Act or ESA?  If you live in the western United States you most likely grew-up understanding the impacts of the ESA.  If you live east of the Mississippi River, the ESA is likely coming your way.

Originally enacted in 1973, Congress envisioned a law which would protect species believed to be on the brink of extinction. When the law was enacted, there were 109 species listed for protection. Today, there are nearly 1,600 domestic species on the list, with 125 species considered as “candidates” for listing.

Continue reading →

Two localities in Virginia have qualified for natural disaster assistance from the U.S. Department of Agriculture due to losses caused by flooding due to excessive rains since Sept. 1.

Farmers and ranchers in Southampton County and Suffolk qualify for assistance because they are contiguous to the seven counties in North Carolina that have been designated by the USDA as primary natural disaster areas.

The localities were designated natural disaster areas on Oct. 21, making all qualified farm operators in the designated areas eligible for low-interest emergency loans from the USDA’s Farm Service Agency, provided eligibility requirements are met. Farmers in eligible areas have eight months from the date of the declaration to apply for loans to help cover part of their actual losses.

Interested farmers may contact their local USDA Service Centers for information on eligibility requirements and application procedures.

Additional information is also available online at disaster.fsa.usda.gov.

From American Farm Bureau Federation President Zippy Duvall:

The idea of having the right to manage your own property is as ingrained in the idea of America as the ideas of independence, liberty and freedom. In “The Federalist Papers,” James Madison, one of the signers of our Constitution, wrote, “Government is instituted no less for protection of the property than of the persons of individuals.” It was the desire to own property and the vastness of available land in the “New World” that attracted so many to leave crowded Europe in the late 1700s, stake their claim in wide-open America and use the land for productive purposes, including raising crops and livestock. Some of today’s farmers and ranchers are descendants of those who came to America in those early days with the dream of owning land.

The founders of our nation understood the importance of land ownership and property rights. Today, that concept seems to be under attack by the very government that was founded on the basis of independence, liberty and freedom. John Duarte, a fourth-generation California farmer, is defending himself again an Environmental Protection Agency lawsuit claiming that he broke the law by plowing his land. He faces millions of dollars in federal penalties, plus the multi-million-dollar cost of the legal fight. A couple of years ago, a West Virginia farmer was told by EPA that dust and feathers blown to the ground from her chicken houses constituted a violation of the Clean Water Act. Farm Bureau helped her defend her farm in court and the court sided with her. However, that hasn’t stopped the EPA from going after more farmers for the same type of activity.

Continue reading →

Farm Bureau is urging Congress to pass legislation blocking a recent IRS proposal that would result in higher estate taxes for farmers and ranchers. The IRS’ plan for more restrictive rules for using valuation discounts would make it more difficult for farmers and ranchers who operate family-owned partnerships, LLCs or corporations to transfer their farms and ranches to the next generation.

The Protect Family Farms and Businesses Act (H.R. 6100 and S. 3436), introduced in the House by Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) and in the Senate by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), would stop the IRS from implementing its proposed restrictive estate tax discount valuation.

Continue reading →

Every four years, the American Farm Bureau Federation asks the Democratic and Republican presidential nominees to address the issues that concern farmers and ranchers the most. We asked Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump the same questions.

International trade was a major theme in the opening half hour of Monday night’s presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.  Selling more of our goods around the world is a great way to help farms and ranches, benefit rural communities, and keep the United States ahead of its global competitors. Farm Bureau seeks the successful conclusion and congressional approval of trade agreements and other measures to expand global markets for U.S. agricultural exports.

According to a U.S. International Trade Commission report released May 18, 2016, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) would reduce the U.S. trade deficit and increase jobs throughout the country, but some of the biggest gains would be for the agriculture sector.

Continue reading →

Every four years, the American Farm Bureau Federation asks the Democratic and Republican presidential nominees to address the issues that concern farmers and ranchers the most. We asked Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump the same questions.

For farmers and ranchers, immigration reform must balance agriculture’s need for a dependable supply of agricultural labor with enhanced security at our nation’s border.  It is a delicate balance that, at present, has not yielded a solution.

Reliable and skilled farm workers are harder to come by with each harvest season. U.S. agriculture faces a critical shortage of workers every year, as citizens are largely unwilling to engage in these rigorous activities and guestworker programs are unable to respond to the marketplace.

Without an efficient and legal way for a dependable supply of farm workers to enter the country, more U.S. crops are being left to rot in the field.  Or they cannot expand their fruit and vegetable farm or ranch.  And that means consumers will be less able to enjoy American-grown products.

Continue reading →