Farm Bureau Responds to Bay Journal Article

Last week, the Chesapeake Bay Journal published an article called, “Farm Bureau can choose to be a sore loser or part of the solution.” Below is Virginia Farm Bureau’s response:

It’s disappointing to read the Chesapeake Bay Foundation—Virginia‘s call for American Farm Bureau Federation to stop the rhetoric and be part of the solution. Implying that Farm Bureau is a sore loser and that farmers are lacking effort for a healthy Chesapeake Bay simply continues rhetoric; and is anti-farmer. If we all took the time to read the May issue of the Chesapeake Bay Journal you’d learn the following: Submerged Aquatic Vegetation is at 30 year high, crab populations are at 4 year high, oysters and shellfish are off slightly due to cold winter (not water quality). If you read further, Virginia leads the East Coast in oyster and clam production. These things would not be occurring if Farm Bureau members were not doing their part; and in many cases more than their fair share. It’s sad to hear that the recent Agriculture Census shows that the bay model was using data that overestimated the number of cattle in Virginia and therefore overstated their role in the condition of the bay. That’s not rhetoric.
The Clean Water Act, and the associated federal and state regulations, has been debated and litigated since it was passed decades ago. There is no doubt that will continue. CBF has done, and will likely do, its fair share to perpetuate that debate, litigation, and rhetoric. The advice provided in CBF’s commentary is one everyone should follow, stop the rhetoric and work to maintain a healthy Chesapeake Bay. We know the farmers are doing their part; are you?

Governor Vetoes Property Rights Bill

Unfortunately, the Governor just vetoed Senator Obenshain’s SB543 which VFBF supported. He had previously offered amendments to the General Assembly to weaken the bill, and those amendments were overwhelmingly rejected in the Senate by a bipartisan vote of 30-9.
Virginia Farm Bureau had sent a letter along with the Virginia Agribusiness Council and the National Federation of Independent Businesses asking him to sign the bill as passed. We are disappointed in the Governor’s decision and will work to protect private property rights in the 2017 Session. You can read the Governor’s press release here: https://governor.virginia.gov/newsroom/newsarticle?articleId=15335.

SB543 was introduced to better protect landowners and align with the language in the property rights constitutional amendment that passed in 2012. The legislation seeks to direct the court to reimburse a plaintiff for the costs of an inverse condemnation proceeding for “damaging” property if a judgment is entered for the plaintiff. Under current law, the court is directed to award compensation only for the “taking” of property. This would make sure that if your farm is damaged by the taking of a property next to you, you will be compensated fairly.

Since the constitutional amendment went into effect, utilities and special interests have tried to maintain that only certain protections for you as a landowner go into effect if your property is completely taken. Virginia law is clear that a jury may award you compensation if you can prove that an eminent domain project caused damage to your farm. SB543 was crucial as several large condemnation projects are set to get underway soon!

SB543 passed the House of Delegates and Senate unanimously.

Virginia Farm Bureau Grain Marketing Key Player in Supply Chain

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Virginia’s farmers produced more than half a billion bushels of grain and soybeans between 2006 and 2012. And the Virginia Farm Bureau Federation Grain Marketing Division moves millions of those bushels across the state annually.

An important part of the grain supply chain is farmers’ sale of those commodities. Profits are made through timely decisions on how and where to market crops, and the VFBF grain division helps with those sales. The program, which is approaching its 45th year, connects Virginia grain producers with buyers and markets.

“I work with about 17 buyers and dump trucks at 25 destinations to try and figure out what the best net price is,” explained Robert Harper, VFBF grain manager. “My job is to help farmers get the best prices for their grains.”

VFBF is one of only a few state Farm Bureaus that offer such a service to their members. Its grain division is a licensed grain dealer that Farm Bureau put in place in 1972 to help producer members buy and sell bulk loads of grains.

“Farmers in the late 1960s wanted access to more markets. They solicited $65,000 from 311 members in 22 counties to fund the first grain manager position at Farm Bureau,” explained Harper, who is the fifth grain manager. He works closely with a senior agriculture market analyst and accounting staff. Farm Bureau also offers its members access to a broker to hedge and to buy and sell options on their production.

When the division began, very few farmers had semi-trucks to move grain to destination markets. Farm Bureau gave them access to trucks and developed better basis prices—the difference between the futures market and the local cash price—by pooling bushels for members.

Harper, a former Virginia Cooperative Extension agent, has been selling grain for producers since 2014. He acts as a hub to connect producers with buyers and carriers.

“Some producers choose to have grain or beans picked up at the farm, and some choose to deliver themselves. Producers appreciate this flexibility,” he said.

Contact Harper at 804-290-1105.

Study Finds Cars, Not Cows, are Greater Contributors to Greenhouse Gas Emissions

A recently published white paper, Livestock’s Contributions to Climate Change: Facts and Fiction, sheds new light on the role of livestock production in greenhouse gas emissions.

Authored by Dr. Frank Mitloehner, professor and air-quality specialist at the University of California-Davis, the paper identifies energy production and cars, not cows, as the largest U.S. contributors of greenhouse gases that are believed to drive climate change.

Mitloehner’s paper is a response to claims that livestock production is to blame for the lion’s share of U.S. contributions to total GHG emissions. The paper reveals that the U.S. livestock sector contributes 4 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, compared to 27 percent from the transportation sector and 31 percent from the energy sector.

“The white paper on livestock’s contribution to climate change puts EPA greenhouse gas estimates in perspective,” said Tony Banks, a commodity marketing specialist for Virginia Farm Bureau Federation. “Some special interest groups would have us believe that livestock are responsible for over half of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. The EPA estimates animal agriculture is responsible for only 4 percent of emissions, but that doesn’t even include the volume of greenhouse gas captured by agricultural crops and grassland.”

Mitloehner does not underestimate the need to control livestock emissions, but he does point out that, in the past six decades, “the U.S. livestock sector has shown considerable progress to continually reduce its environmental footprint.”

In fact, since the 1950s the carbon footprint of the U.S. beef and dairy sector has continued to shrink as production increased or stayed the same.

A progress report comparing beef production from 1977 to 2007 found that industry’s carbon footprint was reduced by 16 percent over the past 30 years.

“The U.S. livestock farms have the lowest carbon footprint per unit of livestock product produced compared to livestock farms in other countries,” Banks said. “U.S. livestock farms employ technology and improved genetics and management that improve the production efficiency; in turn that reduces environmental impacts for air, soil and water.”

It is time, Mitloehner wrote, “to end the rhetoric and separate facts from fiction around the numerous sectors that contribute emissions and to identify solutions for the global food supply.”

The full white paper is available at afia.org/rc_files/801/livestocks_contribution_to_climate_change_facts_and_fiction.pdf.


VSU to Host 2016 National Small Farm Conference

The 7th National Small Farm Conference with the theme of “Creating and Sustaining Small Farmers and Ranchers” will be held September 20-22, 2016, at the Virginia Beach Convention Center in Virginia Beach, VA.

Strategies for creating and sustaining small farmers and ranchers for enhanced farm income and improved quality of life will be discussed. Successes in small farm activities will be shared as well as innovative ideas in research, extension and outreach to strengthen collaboration and partnership among state specialists who work to ensure that small farmers and ranchers not only survive, but thrive in today’s economy. This Conference will also serve as a forum to discuss the results of research geared towards addressing challenges facing small farmers and ranchers. Strengthening partnerships created at the six previous National Small Farm Conferences will continue to be a priority for the Virginia Beach meeting.

This conference will consist of short courses, oral presentations, exhibits, poster paper presentations, success stories, and educational tours within the Virginia Beach region, the Chesapeake Bay region and North Carolina.

For more information, click here.

Farm Bureau Rural Entrepreneurship Challenge Opens During National Small Business Week

The American Farm Bureau Federation will open online applications for its third Rural Entrepreneurship Challenge on May 1, to coincide with National Small Business Week (May 1-7). Entrepreneurs will compete for $145,000 in startup funds.

The competition provides an opportunity for individuals to showcase ideas and business innovations that benefit rural regions of the United States. It is the first national rural business competition focused exclusively on innovative entrepreneurs working on food and agriculture businesses.

Competitors are invited to submit for-profit business ideas related to food and agriculture online starting May 1 at www.strongruralamerica.com/challenge.

Businesses related to food and agriculture include farms or ranches, value-added food processing, food hubs, community-supported agriculture programs (CSAs), farm-to-table restaurants, farmers’ markets, wineries, breweries, cideries and distilleries. Businesses can also support food and agriculture such as crop scouting, agritourism, ag advertising agencies and ag technology companies.

“Owners of all types of businesses across the food and agriculture supply chain are encouraged to enter the competition,” said Dr. Lisa Benson, AFBF’s director of rural development. “Through the challenge, we’ll provide 10 rural entrepreneurs with access to funding to take their businesses to the next level.”

All applications, which include a business plan, video pitch and photo, must be submitted online by June 30. Judges will review the applications and provide feedback to the participants.

The top 10 teams will be announced in October. This includes six teams who will each win $10,000 in startup funds.

The final four teams will compete in a live competition at AFBF’s 98th Annual Convention in Phoenix on Jan. 8 to win:
  • Farm Bureau Entrepreneur of the Year award and $30,000 (chosen by judges)
  • People’s Choice award and $25,000 (chosen by public vote)
  • First runner-up prize, $15,000 and
  • Second runner-up prize, $15,000.

The Entrepreneur of the Year award and the People’s Choice award will be awarded to two different teams. The team that wins the Entrepreneur of the Year award will not be eligible for the People’s Choice Award. The competition timeline, detailed eligibility guidelines and profiles of the 2015 and 2016 finalist teams are available at www.strongruralamerica.com/challenge.